Multi-Agent Fit Assessment
8 questions about decomposition, coordination, and governance readiness. A recommendation: multi-agent, single agent, or no agent at all.
This assessment scores whether a task needs a multi-agent system, a single agent, or no agent at all, based on task decomposition, coordination complexity, governance readiness, and five other factors.
Task Decomposition
Can the work be cleanly split into independent sub-tasks with different specializations?
How it works
Answer 8 questions
Covering task decomposition, coordination complexity, context limits, governance readiness, failure isolation, volume, orchestration experience, and specialization.
Each answer points a direction
Higher points push toward multiple agents; lower points push toward a single agent or a deterministic workflow.
Get a 0-100 fit score
Points are summed and normalized to a 0-100 scale.
See your recommendation
Your score maps to Multi-Agent Justified, Single Agent Sufficient, or Skip Agents Entirely.
When should I use this?
- A single agent is straining under too much context or too many tools.
- Distinct parts of a task need genuinely different skills, models, or failure handling.
- You're deciding whether to split an existing agent into several before building more.
Who is this for?
- Engineering teams designing an agentic system from scratch.
- Teams whose single agent is starting to feel overloaded.
- AI leads evaluating whether multi-agent orchestration is worth the coordination cost.
Common Questions