Agent Readiness Assessment

8 questions about the task, not the technology. A recommendation: agent, deterministic workflow, or hybrid, including when the honest answer is "don't use an agent."

This assessment scores whether a task should be built as an AI agent, a deterministic workflow, or a hybrid, based on task complexity, autonomy, frequency, error cost, and four other factors — before any code gets written.

1 / 8

Task Complexity

How much judgment does each step require?

How it works

01

Answer 8 questions

Covering task complexity, autonomy, frequency, error cost, tool count, human approval, data requirements, and workflow variability.

02

Each answer points a direction

Higher points push toward an agent; lower points push toward a deterministic workflow.

03

Get a 0-100 fit score

Points are summed and normalized to a 0-100 scale.

04

See your recommendation

Your score maps to Agent Justified, Hybrid Approach, or Deterministic Workflow.

When should I use this?

  • You're deciding how to build a new automation and want to know if it needs an agent.
  • An existing workflow keeps breaking on edge cases a fixed script can't handle.
  • You want to avoid building an agent for a task a deterministic pipeline would handle better.

Who is this for?

  • Engineers scoping a new automation before writing code.
  • Product and engineering leads deciding where to spend agent-building effort.
  • Teams under pressure to "add AI" who want to check the task fits first.

Common Questions

About the Assessment

We use analytics cookies to understand how visitors use the site. No ads or retargeting. Learn more